Since I am a sponsor I generally support this, however I would prefer the discussion period to be 4 days instead of 3 so we get a 1 week total period for every piece of legislation from now on.
Secretary-General - 1st Council President & WAD - 33rd, 34th and 35th Cabinet Minister of Foreign Affairs - 32nd Cabinet Minister of Domestic Affairs - 30th and 31st Cabinet Minister of Immigration and Regional Promotion (Defunct) - 28th Cabinet
Post by devintheroaster on Feb 22, 2020 18:22:02 GMT
Section 1 should say "At least 5 days" in my opinion. 3 days feels much too short as somebody who works most days.
Section 2 should be 5 and 7 days in my opinion. The vote definitely needs to be a work week at least, and charter amendments at 7 is the right number, I believe. 3 days would allow things to be pressed through very quickly without very many checks, I think. I'm in favor of a longer voting period, even if the scrutiny period is shortened; I feel stronger about this than I do the scrutiny period.
No quarrels with section 3.
President in the 26th Cabinet Sec-Gen in the 28th, 30th, 31st and 34th Cabinets MoRP in the 25th and 26th Cabinets MoIRP in the 28th Cabinet Administrator Emeritus 21 November 2018-9 April 2019 Ambassador to The Communist Bloc 9 Augest 2018-1 November 2018
I would definitely support it being shortened. I don't think there was any noticeable increase in votes over the full length of time. Nearly everyone voted in the first few days. I think 3 days would honestly probably be fine, but 4 days would be good too.
Secretary-General - 33rd, 35th Cabinets Director of World Assembly Affairs - 29th Cabinet Ambassador to Social Liberal Union - 28th, 29th, 32nd, 33rd, 34th Cabinets Ambassador to Europeia - 32nd Cabinet Cabinet Aide to MoDA - 33rd, 34th Cabinets